Thursday, September 19, 2013

iOS7 "updates"

Finally saw all the latest "updates" to iOS7. Nothing but copying all the famous apps on Google Play and some device tweaks by Samsung and HTC.



  1. One touch to control brightness - Samsung. This is one cool feature that's missing from stock Android. Samsung really tweaked their hardware to fit this in. Hats off!
  2. One touch to switch on FLASH - numerous apps on Play
  3. One touch airplane mode - plenty of widgets on home screen can do that
  4. Automatic app updating - duh! Play allows you to do that. Question is, why Apple didn't have this feature till now. lol
  5. AirDrop update - NFS, WiFi direct and BlueTooth already allow you to do this on Android phones
  6. Photo filters - Android 4.3 stock has enough filters. Plus simple apps like LittlePhoto give you extra options. These two together are way more than what iOS7 offers.
  7. Dynamic wallpapers (with bubbles) - Lol! Their USP is "no more boring 2D wallpapers". Hello? Ever heard of Live Wallpaper? Yeah. Came out years ago on Android phones.
  8. Safari's Unified Smart Search Field - This is one of the best features that has existed on Android since start of time itself. Not sure if this allows you to search for contacts, apps etc., on your iPhone, but the one on Android sure does. A single search bar to search anything in the Universe!
  9. iTunes Radio - Similar to Pandora. Picked up as it is!
  10. FaceTime Audio - So, they had a great app that allowed seamless video chatting. They just added the "audio only" option. Yawn. Are you even trying?


The one thing iOS7 didn't care about is the battery life. Plenty of complaints after the update that the battery is draining off soon. Users have to change some settings to stop this from happening.

Of course, for a large base of Apple users these simple steps appear too complicated and too "tech-y" and they need to have a step-by-step guide for this. I am sure people will be thronging the Apple store to get this done and they will be charged plenty of dollars by "Apple Genius".

Source for the iOS7 updates: Coolest Updates on iOS7

Friday, September 13, 2013

Stop Apostrophe Abuse

It's been a long time since I wrote anything here. Haven't really found time to blog much off late. What will all the relocating! It was quite a mess.
New broadband connection set-up and working perfectly. So, let's get to business!



I have been meaning to write this article from a long time (eternal procrastinator). On a serious note, the reason I didn't think it was important was because I thought people would understand and use the apostrophe properly. But, NO! The misuse and abuse of the poor little thing is incessant and doesn't seem to be getting any better. Even professionals I know are good with the English language seem to misuse the fella'.

So, let me just give you a "crash course", if you will, about the proper usage of the apostrophe in different cases.

First off, apostrophe is mainly used for two and only two reasons:
1) To indicate possession
2) As a contraction

In no case, I mean in ABSOLUTELY NO INSTANCE, does apostrophe indicate plural. NEVER. No. It's not meant for that.

Possession vs. Plural
If the hat belongs to the kid, you say, "The kid's hat." Here, the apostrophe indicates that the hat belongs to the kid.
If you love kids (who doesn't!) and you wish to express the same, you say, "I love kids!" Note how there is no apostrophe? That's because it indicates plural form of kid - kids. There is no possession here. You are not expressing whose kids, just kids, of any kind.
Now, let's say you wish to say you love the kids(again, no apostrophe) that your sister has spawned. In this case, you say, "I love my sister's kids!" The apostrophe in "sister's" indicates that the "kids" belong to "sister".



English is a funny language. The letter 's' is used for both possession and plural. Let's now look at some peculiar cases.

Normal word - Nurse


Plural of nurse is "nurses" (s at the end is used to indicate that there are multiple nurse).
Eg., I visited the hospital today and ran into a lot of nurses.

"nurse's" indicates something that belongs to a nurse (s preceded by our dear little friend the apostrophe indicates something that belongs to a nurse. Just one nurse).
Eg., I visited the hospital today to return the nurse's pants. (I will let you explain how they ended up with you).

Now for the peculiar case. How do you say something that belongs to a bunch of nurses? This is where it becomes tricky. "nurses's"? No. That's wrong.
The correct way to say it is "nurses'" You say nurses (the plural form) and then attach an apostrophe at the end to indicate something that belongs to them.
Eg., I visited the hospital today to observe nurses' duties. You are observing the duties that belong to a bunch of nurses.

Peculiar word - Ends with s

OK. Enough with the nurses. Let's take another example. A person's name? This will be interesting.
What name shall we consider? OK. I had to do some research about this and I finally decided to choose one of my favourite characters - Agnes (from the fantastic Despicable Me).
We know she loves unicorns (again, no apostrophe. She loves multiple unicorn, not something that belongs to a certain unicorn).



The plural form of proper nouns are tricky. For the sake of this article, let's say the plural form of Agnes can be Agneses.
Eg., I visited Dr. Dru's lab today and found many Agneses; perhaps he has a cloning machine now(plot for Despicable Me 3, anyone?).

Next, something that belongs to Agnes. How about that unicorn toy?
Eg., Agnes's unicorn is really fluffy.
Remember how earlier I told you you can't use "nurses's"? Yes. In that case, the apostrophe between two s is wrong. But here, it is correct (English is funny that way). "Agnes's" indicates something that belongs to Agnes.

Finally, something that belongs to a bunch of Agnes. You say, "Agneses'"
It's the same with "nurses'". Whenever you have a plural that ends with s, you only add the apostrophe at the end. No need to follow with an 's'.
Eg., The Agneses' hair were all of different colour (Imagine an Agnes with yellow hair!)

Peculiar word - Plural doesn't end with s

Doesn't matter how many times you say this, it isn't enough - English is a funny language. Mr. Amitabh Bacchan explains it in Namak Halaal.

OK. The word 'ox' is one that we can use as an example for this.



Plural form of ox is oxen.
Eg., I saw a lot of oxen grazing in the meadow.

Something that belongs to a single ox - ox's. Simple, right?
Eg., One of the ox's had a Mickey Mouse shaped scar on its stomach.

OK. Now for the peculiar case. Something that belongs to a bunch of ox - oxen's. That's right! Even though it's a plural, you still attach an apostrophe followed by 's'.
Eg., All the oxen's colour was brown, which seemed really strange.

Another good example for this would be - person.
Plural - people.
Belonging to a person - person's
Belonging toe a bunch of person - people's
Note: "peoples" and "persons" are not words.

Well, that's that. That's the proper way of using the apostrophe when it comes to plurals and possession. I think I have covered all the cases.

Contractions
Now, moving on to the next use of apostrophe - contractions.
Contractions are a lazy person's way of writing. Instead of using full words, sometimes it becomes important to contract the word to a shorter form. While doing this, the apostrophe comes into picture.
Most common examples:
"can not" becomes "can't"
"will not" becomes "won't"
"shall not" becomes "shan't"

I have seen people make mistakes here! Some write "could not" as "could'nt"! The correct way is "couldn't".

you're vs. your

you're is a contraction of "you are". "your" indicates possession.
Eg., You're a beautiful girl. Your eyes really stand out. (I know it's cheesy. Deal with it)

it's vs. its

Same case as above. it's is a contraction of "it is". "its" indicates possession.
Eg., It's a nice weather outside. We should take pictures of the park and its surroundings.

let's vs. lets

let's is a contraction of "let us". "lets" is a variant of the word "let".
Eg., Let's step outside. I hear the guard lets early comers take pictures with him.

Miscellaneous example
Here, I would like to mention one very common mistake that people do. Sometimes, the apostrophe is used to indicate possession just to avoid confusion.
Eg., Do's and Don'ts. Explain to me why the apostrophe is used in the first and not in the second. You can't. It's wrong.
If one were to write "Dos and Don'ts", the "Dos" would really be confusing.
The trick here is to use punctuation. Just write the word causing confusion in capitals. "DOs and Don'ts". There you go. Now it's plain and clear.




There are many other such examples where the apostrophe form of a word indicates something entirely different.

I hope this article was of use to you and you will stop abusing the apostrophe in future. Off late, it has been a practice with the Oxford dictionary to include any fad as a legitimate word in the English dictionary. I hope years from now, this abuse of apostrophe isn't so common that Oxford is forced to declare that it's the right way to use the apostrophe!



Language is an art, not science. There is no algorithm. Nothing is concrete. Everything is at your disposal. That is why different words mean the same, differently spelled words are pronounced the same, words spelled the same are pronounced differently.

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Schadenfreude


I first came across this term in one of my favourite TV shows - Boston Legal. Alan Shore argues brilliantly to save one of his clients from a murder charge by claiming that everyone wants to see her behind the bars just because she is a high profile celebrity and it is in the primal nature of a human being to enjoy the downfall of a Great.

When one person sees another person with something they want, or that person is someone they want to be, the immediate reaction is to get what they want. This someone can be a child with a lollypop or a celebrity with immense fame. If they can't do that or it is not possible to do that, they will slowly develop a feeling that the other person shouldn't have it either. It then transforms into a feeling of hope that the other person will eventually lose it. Some even go as far as taking an action to make sure the person loses it. In the case when it does happen and the person wails over it, they exult! This feeling is called Schadenfreude.




I witnessed the same human nature bare naked on Social Networks and TV reports today. Manchester United, one of the greatest teams of England and Europe lost the title to their neighbours Manchester City on the last day of the season. The match was decided with two injury time goals by Dzeko and Aguero to give City a win based on pure goal difference. United, being one of the most loved and one of the hated team all across the world are the perfect contenders that provoke Schadenfreude.

It was a sad moment for every Manc to see the title taken away when they almost had their hands on it. As it goes, the fans of other clubs - Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal, enjoyed the downfall of United with glee. The rivalry between fans of United and those of the other 'Big 4' in England has been astounding over the years given that United have dominated English Premier League. Rather than being distraught over a team made of money winning the title, they rejoice the loss of United.

This feeling is not just seen in Football but across other sports, too. There are plenty of fans that support Nadal basically because they don't want to see Roger Federer win. You can find many Indians who hate the guts of Sachin Tendulkar; some going as far as hating him for his religion/caste. The reason behind all this is not because these Greats have committed any atrocities worth such hate. It is only because of their fame and success that people want to see them lose their grace.



Being a United fan, the above sure is biased. But the point of this article is not about Manchester United, or Football, or the rivalry between the clubs. It is about the human psyche; the basic nature that loves to see something taken away from another human being.

Schadenfreude is a German word that is sometimes used in other languages and it is used quite rarely in the English literature. But the feeling it describes can be seen since the earlier days of mankind. Humans have always been greedy. But what causes greed? One of the reasons is jealousy. When you as a kid saw another kid enjoying an ice-cream cone, you would be jealous of him. You would want an ice-cream for yourself. That is greed. It doesn't start when you become an adult, but cultivates in human mind since birth.

Schadenfreude is a “by-product” of jealousy. When a human being is jealous, he takes two possible courses of action. One, he tries to get something better that satisfies his greed. Two, it is not possible for him to get the same or something better, so he wishes that the other person shouldn’t have it either. Humans can’t react in any other way.

Here, I would like to quote one of my favourite exchanges between Voldemort and Dumbledore from Harry Potter and the Order of Pheonix:
"Greatness inspires envy, envy engenders spite, spite spawns lies. You must know this, Dumbledore." - Lord Voldemort



It did not make much sense to me back then because when I read the book, I was pretty young and could not comprehend it. But as I went back and read the book later, it made a lot of sense, suddenly and I could relate a lot to it myself!

What I am trying to convey through this post is, doesn’t matter who or what the person is, you can’t kill the primal nature.

PS: I am not trying to start a debate over Football, Cricket or Tennis. This is more about human behaviour.

PPS: This is my first post on this blog and I thank everyone who encouraged and supported me to write :)

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Writers

Who or what are writers?



writer is a person who produces literature or nonfiction, such as novelsshort storiesplaysscreenplayspoetryessaysarticles, or other literary art.
Wiki

But this definition of a writer is definitely not limited to those that produce such fine art. The word has expanded to cover many notions. One of them being a blogger.

Blogging



Blogging has been in existence since man began to express his emotions through words/pictures. The word 'blog' was only coined as recently as 1990 (Wiki); but the idea of it covers anything that can be classified as a 'personal journal'. Some say that a blog is something that is published on the World Wide Web. Others claim that it is only something that has replaced the good old 'journals'. 

Personally, I have never kept a journal. But I have always wanted to write. It's a long term goal in life that got a few starts at times, but I could never carry through.

Since I have no clue how to go about it, I thought let's start off with a blog. What better way for one to express himself? It is a vent. An outlet for your feelings, your emotions, adventures, life events, anything that involves you. Since blogging started, it has also been used to express opinions and ideas. In some instances, it is even used to portray a person's creative side. This is what I am trying to do.

I have been pegged back a lot on many instances from doing this. But today (tonight?), I decided to give it a try after all.



The Internet has got a new blogger.

Let's see how this goes.

PS: This will involve not only my personal experiences, ideas, opinions, but also some fiction.